EVALUATION OF COLLECTION SAMPLES OF SPRING BARLEY ACCORDING TO A COMPLEX OF VALUABLE ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE NOSIVSKA BREEDING AND RESEARCH STATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2310-0478-2023-1-7-17Keywords:
spring barley, collection samples, lodging resistance, protein and starch content, productivity, disease resistanceAbstract
The article is devoted to the study of barley collection material and selection of samples with a complex of valuable economic characteristics in the conditions of the Northern Forest Steppe of Ukraine. In the period 2020–2022 was conducted to study 44 sorts and lines of domestic and foreign breeding of various ecological and geographical origins. The majority (18 samples) originate from Ukraine (UKR), 13 from Canada (CAN), 6 from Kazakhstan (KAZ), 4 from the Czech Republic (CZE), 2 from Serbia (SRB) and 1 sample from Austria (AUS), covering 9 varieties (var. nutans, var. inerme, var. ricotense, var. submedicum, var. parallelum, var. pallidum, var. nudum, var. medicum, var. deficiens). During three years of research, the collection material was divided grouping according to the height of the plants and the characteristics that shape productivity. Shortstemmed samples were selected: Clipper (AUS), Polygena, Trebon (SRB), Danielle (CZE), Arthur (CZE) and standard variety Vzyrets (UKR). According to the results of two years (2020, 2022), Shuffle (CZE) and Dianthus (UKR) samples were noted for their low stems. Samples were distinguished by resistance to diseases (powdery mildew, drechslera teres) and the quality of biochemical indicators of grain. According to the results of evaluation and study of spring barley, the best samples with a complex of valuable economic characteristics were selected: Stimul (UKR) and CDC Clear (CAN) (spike length, kernel number per spike, weight of grains from spike, mass of grains from a plant, mass of 1000 grains); Arthur (CZE) (short stem length, spike length, kernel number per spike, weight of grains from spike, weight of 1000 grains) and Inari (CZE) (spike length, kernel number per spike, weight of grains from spike, weight of 1000 grains). The samples Krasen (Orion) (UKR), CDC ExPlus (CAN), CDC Hilose (CAN) were characterized by high productive bushiness. The samples with high protein content (≥16.0%) were: Dianthus, Ly–1059, Ly–1096, Ly–1089 (UKR); Erie and Gateway (CAN).
References
Verma R.P.S. Barley: Global challenges and perspectives under non-tropical dry areas. Wheat and Barley Research. 2018. Vol. 10 (3). P. 123–137. DOI: doi.org/10.25174/2249-4065/2018/85893.
Ullrich S.E. Significance, adaptation, production, and trade of barley. In Barley: Production, Improvement and Uses /ed S.E. Ullrich. Oxford. UK : Wiley-Blackwell. 2010. P. 3–13.
Kumar V., Khippal A., Singh J., Selvakumar R., Malik R., Kumar D., et al. Barley research in India: Retrospect and prospects. J. Wheat Res. 2014. Vol. 6 (1). P. 1–20.
Lukinac J., Juki’c M. Barley in the Production of Cereal-Based Products. Plants. 2022. Vol. 11 (24). 3519. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/ plants11243519.
La Geng and others. Barley: a potential cereal for producing healthy and functional foods. Food Quality and Safety, 2022. Vol. 6. P. 1–13. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/fqsafe/fyac012.
Shahbandeh M. World Barley Production from 2008/2009 to 2021/2022. Barley Production Worldwide 2008/2009–2021/2022. URL: https://w w w. s t a t i s t a . c o m / s t a t i s t i c s / 2 7 1 9 7 3 / w o r l d -barley-production-since-2008/ (дата звернення: 16.02.2023).
Ullrich S.E. Barley: Production, Improvement and Uses. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2011. 656 р.
Chabane K., Ablett G.A., Cordeiro G.M., Valkoun J., Henry R.J. EST versus genomic derived microsatellite markers for genotyping wild and cultivated barley. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2005. Vol. 52. P. 903–909. DOI: 10.1007/s10722-003-6112-7.
Flint-Garcia S.A., Thornsberry J.M., Buckler E.S. 4th. Structure of linkage disequilibrium in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2003. Vol. 54. P. 357–374. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134907.
Ovesná J., Kučera L., Vaculová K. et al. Analysis of the Genetic Structure of a Barley Collection Using DNA Diversity Array Technology (DArT). Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2013. Vol. 31. P. 280–288. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-012-0491-x.
Pasam R.K., Sharma R., Walther A., O¨zkan H., Graner A., et al. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure in a Legacy Collection of Spring Barley Landraces Adapted to a Wide Range of Climates. PLoS ONE. 2014. Vol. 9 (12). e116164. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116164.
Ільїчов О.Г., Ільїчов Ю.Г., Чигрин А.В. Сирійські зразки голозерного ячменю як джерело нового вихідного матеріалу для селекції в Лісостепу України. Вісник Полтавської державної аграрної академії, 2011. Вип. 3. С. 29–36.
Global strategy for the ex situ conservation and use of barley germplasm. URL: https://www.genebanks.org/resources/crops/barley/.
Milner S.G., Jost M., Taketa S. et al. Genebank genomics highlights the diversity of a global barley collection. Nat Genet. 2019. Vol. 51. P. 319–326. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0266-x.
Музафарова В.А., Рябчун В.К., Петухова І.А., Падалка О.І. Генетична колекція ячменю ярого за стійкістю до хвороб. Селекція і насінництво, 2016. Вип. 110. С. 107–116.
Сабадин В.Я. Джерела цінних господарських ознак сортів колекції ячменю ярого для селекції у центральному Лісостепу України. Агробіологія, 2019. Вип. 2. С. 33–42.
Zeng X.Q. Genetic variability in agronomic traits of a germplasm collection of hulless barley. Genet. Mol. Res. 2015. Vol. 14 (4): 18356–18369. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.4238/2015.December.23.23.
Eshghi R. et al. Evaluation of genetic variability in naked barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences. 2012. Т. 4 (16). P. 1166–1179.
Monteiro V.A., Amabile R.F., Spehar C.R., Faleiro F.G., Vieira E.A., Peixoto J.R., Ribeiro W.Q., Montalvão A.L. Genetic diversity among barley accessions based in morpho-agronomical characteristics under irrigation in the Brazilian savannah. AJCS. 2020. Vol. 14 (09). P. 1385–1393. DOI: 10.21475/ajcs.20.14.09.p2281.
Saroei E., Cheghamirza K., Zarei L. Genetic diversity of characteristics in barley cultivars. Genetika. 2017. Vol. 49 (2). P. 495–510. DOI: 10.2298/GENSR1702495S.
Кириченко Г.І., Вировець В.Г., Лайко І.М. Результативність використання вихідного матеріалу колекційних зразків конопель. Луб’яні та технічні культури : збірник наукових праць. 2011. Вип. 1 (6). С. 89–94.
Білявська Л.Г., Рибальченко А.М. Колекційні зразки сої – цінний вихідний матеріал для селекції. Таврійський науковий вісник. 2018. Вип. 101. С. 9–15.
Глюдзик-Шемота М.Ю. Роль мінливості для отримання високопродуктивних сортів тютюну з комплексом господарсько-цінних ознак. Вісник Національного університету водного господарства та природокористування. 2021. Вип. 2 (94). С. 25–36.
Pandey M., Kopahnke D., Habekuss A., Friedt W. and Ordon F. Screening Nepalese hulless barley germplasm for resistance to major fungal and viral diseases. J. Inst. Agric. Anim. Sci. 2009. Vol. 30. P. 115–124.
Солонечна О.В., Важеніна О.Є., Солонечний П.М., Васько Н.І. Залежність вмісту білка в зернових сортів ячменю від генотипу та гідротермічних умов. Dynamics of the development of world science. Abstracts of the 2nd International scientific and practical conference. Perfect Publishing. Vancouver, Canada. 2019. P. 21–27. URL: http://sciconf.com.ua.
Vasko N.I., Serik M.L., Kozachenko M.R., Naumov O.G., Vazhenina O.E., Solonechnyi P.M., Solonechna O.V., Sheliakina T.A. Content and biological value of protein in grain of spring barley accessions. 2018. Селекція і насінництво, Вип. 113. P. 45–55. DOI: 10.30835/2413-7510.2018.134357.
