FORMATION OF POTENTIAL PRODUCTIVITY OF DIFFERENT PEACH CULTIVARS IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE SOUTHERN STEPPE OF UKRAINE

Authors

  • O.M. Aleksieieva Tavria State Agrotechnological University named after Dmitry Motorny
  • P.G. Bondarenko Melitopol Horticultural Research Station named after M.F. Sydorenko of the Institute of Horticulture of the NAAS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31395/2310-0478-2021-2-78-83

Keywords:

structure of annual growth, differentiation of generative buds, productivity programming, peach, cultivars

Abstract

The article is devoted to a comprehensive study of the main aspects of peach yield formation depending on the influence of cultivar characteristics and weather conditions of the research years in order to adjust main yield-regulating pruning of orchards. Unlike other temperate fruit crops, peach cultivation technology includes strong annual pruning of the trees to maintain sufficient tree vigour and regulate the crop load. The aim of the research was to determine the influence of cultivar peculiarities and weather conditions on the total formation of flower buds on one tree with subsequent adjustment of cultivar- specific pruning to obtain stable yields of high quality peach fruits.The research was carried out in a field experiment during 2017-2019 in the Southern Steppe of Ukraine in the orchard of 7-9 years of age on 6 peach cultivars. Observations included analysis of weather conditions of the zone, determination of the structure of annual tree shoot growth depending on cultivar genotypes and conditions of the year, density of generative buds on different types of shoots, total number of flower buds on trees before dormancy, statistical analysis of experimental data. ‘Posol myru’ cultivar was the most vigorous in the conditions of the study (total annual shoot growth of trees at the level of 151.2 m), while ‘Yuvileinyi Sydorenka’ and ‘Vireneia’ cultivars were the least vigorous (96.2 and 98.3 m, respectively). In the structure of total shoot growth, the share of mixed annual proleptic shoots amounted to 53-80%, of summer sylleptic shoots – 5-16%, and of spurs – 3-23%. ‘Redhaven’ and ‘Krymskyi feierverk’ cultivars had the highest flower bud density on mixed annual shoots, where the bulk of the peach yield is concentrated – 51.0 and 51.3 buds per 1 running m of the shoot on average for three years of the research, respectively. It should be noted that this index significantly depended on both cultivar characteristics and weather conditions during the generative bud differentiation. ‘Posol myru’ cultivar was selected as the one with the highest productivity potential – an average of 6210 generative buds on a tree, which was 1.1-2.2 times higher than other cultivars.As a result of the research it was determined that in order to obtain the planned yield of 15-20 t/ha while maintaining high quality of the fruits, up to 70% of annual shoot growth should be removed during pruning of peach trees of ‘Posol myru’ cultivar, 60-65% – for ‘Krymskyi feierverk’, ‘Skazka’ and ‘Redhaven’ cultivars, and only 30-40% – for ‘Yuvileinyi Sydorenka’ and ‘Vireneia’ cultivars.

References

Beppu K. Problems in Cultivation of Prunus Fruit Tree Species due to Global Warming and Future Directions. Horticultural Research (Japan). 2020. 19(3). P. 219-228. https://doi.org/10.2503/hrj.19.219

Caprio J.M., Quamme H.A. Influence of weather on apricot, peach and sweet cherry production in the Okanagan Valley of British Columbia. Canadian journal of plant science. 2006. 86(1). P. 259-267.

Chatzitheodorou I.T., Sotiropoulos T.E, Mouhtaridou G.I. Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilisation and manure on fruit yield and fruit quality of the peach cultivars ‘Spring Time’ and ‘Red Haven’. Agronomy research. 2004. 2(2). P. 135-143.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: FAOSTAT. URL: http://www.fao.org/faostat/

Li Y., Wang L., Zhu G., Fang W., Cao K., Chen C., Wang X. Phenological response of peach to climate change exhibits a relatively dramatic trend in China, 1983–2012. Scientia Horticulturae. 2016. Vol. 209. P. 192-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.06.019

Okie W.R., Werner D.J. Genetic Influence on Flower Bud Density in Peach and Nectarine Exceeds That of Environment. HortScience. 1996. 31(6). P. 1010-1012. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.31.6.1010

Peavey M., Goodwin I., McClymont L. The Effects of Canopy Height and Bud Light Exposure on the Early Stages of Flower Development in Prunus persica (L.) Batsch. Plants. 2020. 9(9). P. 1073. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9091073

Penso G.A., Citadin I., Scariotto S., Santos C.E.M.d., Junior A.W., Bruckner C.H., Rodrigo J. Development of Peach Flower Buds under Low Winter Chilling Conditions. Agronomy. 2020. 10. P. 428. https://doi.org/10.3390/ agronomy10030428

Prats-Llinàs M.T., López G., Fyhrie K., Pallas B., Guédon Y., Costes E., DeJong T.M. Long proleptic and sylleptic shoots in peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) trees have similar, predetermined, maximum numbers of nodes and bud fate patterns. Annals of Botany. 2019. 123(6). P. 993–1004. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcy232

Reig C., GonzÁlez-Rossia D., Juan M., AgustÍ M. Effects of fruit load on flower bud initiation and development in peach. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. 2006. 81(6). P. 1079-1085. https://doi.org /10.1080/14620316.2006.11512175

Surányi D. Comparative analysis of peach and nectarine cultivars based on their ecological and biological indicators. International Journal of Horticultural Science. 2020. 26. P. 7-26. https://doi.org/10.31421/ IJHS/26/2020/8006

Szalay L. Comparison of flower bud development in almond, apricot and peach genotypes. International Journal of Horticultural Science. 2006. 12(2). P. 93-98. https://doi. org/10.31421/IJHS/12/2/639

Алексеева О.Н., Уманец Л.М. Прогнозирование урожая персика разных сортов в условиях южной Степи Украины. Актуальные вопросы развития аграрного образования и науки: материалы научно-практической конференции: Часть 1. Рос. гос. аграрн. заочн. ун-т. Москва, 2010. С. 26-31.

Алексєєва О.М. Основні аспекти формування потенційного врожаю і нормуючого обрізування різних сортів персика. Достижения и перспективы развития селекции, возделывания и использования плодовых культур: материалы международной научной конференции, посвященной 200-летию Никитского ботанического сада. Ялта, 2011. С. 138-140.

Доспехов Б.А. Методика полевого опыта. 5 изд., перераб. и доп. Москва: Агропромиздат, 1985. 351 с.

Кондратенко П.В., Бублик М.О. Методика проведення польових досліджень з плодовими культурами. К.: Аграрна наука, 1996. 96 с.

Площі, валові збори та урожайність сільськогосподарських культур, плодів, ягід та винограду у 2017 році (остаточні дані). Державна служба статистики України. URL: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2017/sg/pvzu/pvzu2017_xl.zip

Смыков А.В., Иващенко Ю.А., Федорова О.С. Влияние климатических условий южного берега Крыма на урожайность интродуцированных сортов персика Амберголд и Голден. Бюллетень Государственного Никитского ботанического сада. 2018. 128. С. 122-127. https:// doi.org/10.25684/NBG.boolt.128.2018.15

Смыков А.В., Федорова О.С. Зависимость продуктивности персика от биологических особенностей сортов и погодно-климатических условий на южном берегу Крыма. Биология растений и садоводство: теория, инновации. 2019. 150. С. 67-77. https://doi.org/10.36305/2019- 1-150-67-77

Published

2023-05-03

Issue

Section

САДІВНИЦТВО ТА ВИНОГРАДАРСТВО