AGROBIOLOGICAL EVALUATION ALLIUM AMPELOPRASUM VAR. AMPELOPRASUM L.
Keywords:
Allium ampeloprasum, Allium sativum, garlic, species, variety, leaf, bulbils, yieldAbstract
The article presents the results of studies of biological and morphological features of introduced forms of Elephant garlic (Allium ampeloprasum var. ampeloprasum L.) in comparison with garlic cultivars (Allium sativum L.) Sofiivskyi and Prometei. Research on collection samples began in 2016. Samples of Elephant garlic were obtained by expeditionary method (from Greece and Khmelnytsky region). Several plants with long dark green, broad and leathery leaves, pink inflorescences with microcloves (bulbils), large bulbs were selected and vegetatively (clonally) propagated to create a population of homogeneous plants. The study used field, laboratory, statistical, computational and analytical methods. The research was conducted in the training and production department of Uman National University of Horticulture during 2020-2021, using collection varieties of different ecological and geographical origin (Ukraine and Greece). Cultivars/varieties were evaluated according to the following parameters: plant height, leaf area, and indicators of individual productivity (bulb weight, number of teeth and bulbils, etc.), yield and nutritional value. It was found that varieties of Аllium ampeloprasum var. ampeloprasum L. react more sharply to changes in growing conditions than cultivars of Allium sativum L. Winter hardiness of cultivars of Elephant garlic was in the range of 98,0–100%, but they had low adaptability, where the coefficient of adaptability (CA) was 0,45–0,49, and in winter garlic CA = 0,95–0,97. Plants of Аllium ampeloprasum var. ampeloprasum L. do not form air bubbles, but on the bottom and under the covering scales of the bulb is formed from 3-5 to 10 pcs. bulbils. Varieties № 2 and № 3 have 7.1 and 5.1 large teeth in their structure, respectively. The weight of the bulb without removal of the flowering scape in the cultivar Sofiivskyi was less than the samples № 2 and № 3, respectively, by 28.4-53.3 g. With the removal of the flowering scape, the difference increased to 60.5-68.6 g. Yield of Аllium ampeloprasum var. ampeloprasum L. without removal of the flowering scape № 2 was lower than the standard by 1.7 t/ha, at the same time the variety № 3 exceeded the standard by 1.1 t/ha. With the removal of the flowering scape, the yield of cultivars № 2 and № 3 exceeded the cultivar Sofiivskyi by 1.6 and 2.2 t/ha. As a result of research it was found that the introduced forms of Аllium ampeloprasum var. ampeloprasum L. have high indicators of economic value, but they are limited in the first years of cultivation, the period of adaptation to new soil and climatic conditions, which creates some difficulties in their cultivation and reproduction.
References
Danin, A. Distribution Atlas of Plantsinthe Flora Palaestinaarea. The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Jerusalem. 2004, 1–517.
Lim, T. Allium ampeloprasum. Edible Medicinal and Non Medicinal Plants. 2015. (pp.103-123) doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9511-1_3.
Emir, C., Coban, G. & Emir, A. Metabolomics Profiling, Biological Activities, and Molecular Docking Studies of Elephant Garlic (Allium ampeloprasum L.). Process Biochemistry. 2022, 116. 49-59. Doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2022.03.002
Ron L. Growing Great Garlic, 2nd Edition, Filaree Productions, 1992, p. 7.
Stace C. A. New Flora of the British Isles (Third ed.). Cambridge, UK.: Cambridge University Press. 2010, 903 p.
Dimpoulos P., Raus, T., Bergmeier, E., Constantinidis, T., Iatrou, G., Kokkini, S., Strid A., & Tzanoudakis, D. Vascular plants of Greece. An annotated checklist: Botanic gardens and botanical museum Berlin-Dahlem, Berlin and Hellenic botanical society, Athens. 2013, 1–372.
Mishra, A. C. IC0598236: A Potential Genotype of Great Headed Garlic (Allium ampeloprasum var. ampeloprasum L.). Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources. 2016,
75. Doi: 10.5958/0976-1926.2016.00013.9.
Sulistiorini D., Van der Meer, Q. P. Allium ampeloprasum L. cv. group Leek. In: Siemonsma, J. S. & KasemPiluek (Editors). Plant Resources of South-East Asia Vegetables. Pudoc Scientific Publishers, Wageningen, Ne1993, 8,62–64.
Brewster J. L. Onions and other vegetable Alliums. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom, 1994, 236.
Christopher D. Preston, David A. Pearman, Allan R. Hall. Archaeophytes in Britain Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 2013, 145 (3), 257–294.
Flora of North America. Electronic resource, access mode: http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=1&taxon_id=242101330
Guarrera P. M., Savo V. Perceived health properties of wild and cultivated food plants in local and popular traditions of Italy, A review. J Ethnopharmacol 2013, 146,
–680.
Polito, F., Amato, G., Caputo, L., De Feo, V., Fratianni, F., Candido, V., Nazzaro, F. Chemical Composition and Agronomic Traits of Allium sativum and Allium ampeloprasumLeaves and Bulbs and Their Action against Listeria monocytogenes and Other Food Pathogens. Foods. 2022, 11. 995. Doi: 10.3390/foods11070995.
Triano E. C., Ruiz Cabello E., Fernández Luque A., Gómez Miranda A., Jiménez Conejo A., Gutiérrez CampañaJ. A., Postigo J. A., Castro Montes J., Sánchez Najarro J. F.,
Marín Osuna J. R., Martos M., Mérida Moral M. D., MéridaRamírez M. J., Moral R., Hinijosa R. Recuperatus tradiciones. Etnobotánica del Subbético Cordobés. Ayuntamiento de Carcabuey. Córdoba: Carcabuey, 1998.
Malafaia C. R. A., Silva B. P., Tinoco L. W., Parente J. P. Structural characterization and gastroprotective property of a novel glucofructan from Allium ampeloprasum var.
porrum. Carbohydr Res 2015, 402, 44–49.
Najda, A., Błaszczyk, L., Winiarczyk, K., Dyduch, J., Tchórzewska, D. Comparative studies of nutritional and health-enhancing properties in the “garlic-like” plant Allium
ampeloprasum var. ampeloprasum (GHG-L) and A. sativum. Scientia Horticulturae. 2016, 201. 247-255. Doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.01.044.
Khorasani, M., Saeidi M. S., Zarre, S. The genus Allium (Amaryllidaceae) in Iran: on the status of Allium ampeloprasum L. and its relatives. Nova Biologica Reperta.
, 5. 299-306. 10.29252/nbr.5.3.299.
Hanelt P., Schulze-Motel J., Fritsch R. M., Kruse J., Maass H., Ohle H., Pistrick K. Infrageneric approach. In: P. Hanelt, K. Hammer & H. Knupfer (Eds.), The Genus Allium.
Taxonomic Problems and Genetic Resources, 1992, 107–123, Gatersleben, Germany.
Mc Collum G. D. Onion and allies. In: N.W. Simmonds (Ed.), Evolution of Crop Plants, 1987, 186–190.
Astely D., Innes N. L., Van der Meer Q. P. Genetic Resources of Allium Species. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources. 1982. Rome Italy.
Havey M. J.. Phylogenetic relationships among cultivated Allium species from restriction enzyme analysis of the chloroplast genome. Theor Appl Genet 1991, 81, 752–
Mes T. H. M., Friesen N., Fritsch R. M, Klaas M.,Bachmann K. Criteria for sampling in Allium based on chloroplast DNAPCR-RFLP’s. Syst Bot 1997, 22 (4), 701–712.
Бондаренко Г. Л., Яковенко К. І. Методика дослідної справи в овочівництві і баштанництві; За ред. Г. Л Бондаренка і Яковенка К. І. Харків: Основа, 2001.
с.
Figliuolo G., Candido V., Logozzo G., Miccolis V.,Spagnoletti Zeuli P. L. Genetic evaluation of cultivated garlic germplasm (Allium sativum L. аnd A. ampeloprasumL.). Euphytica. 2001, 121, 325–334.
Подольских А. Н. Научные основы селекции риса. Дис. д-ра с.-х. наук. Кзылорда, 2004. 274
Horwitz W., Latimer G. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (AOAC). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 21th ed. MD: AOAC International:
Gaithersburg, MD, 2019. USA.
Horwitz W., Latimer. G. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (AOAC). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 20th ed.; MD: AOAC International:
Gaithersburg, MD, 2016. USA.
Guimarães R., Barros L., Dueñas, M., Calhelha, R. C., Carvalho A. M., Santos-Buelga C., Queiroz, M. J. R. P., Ferreira, I. C. F. R. Nutrients, phytochemicals and bioactivity
of wild Roman chamomile: A comparison between the herb and its preparations. Food Chem. 2013; 136, 718–725.
